Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

What happened to “immediate withdrawal”?

Post by Michael Allen on Feb. 28, 2009 at 4:48 pm with 3 Comments »
February 28, 2009 4:48 pm

The upper fold of the newspapers yesterday boomed “Iraq Troop Withdrawal,” or more evocatively, “Pullout From Iraq.” But I suspect some (not all) in the press corps were less than ebullient about President Obama’s speech to the Camp Lejeune Marines.


A few sentences beyond the headlines we learned this was to be an 18-month scaled withdrawal – not the “immediate withdrawal” promised in Campaign ’08. Moreover, we learned that while combat troops will leave, 35,000-50,000 support troops (approximately the same number now stationed in Korea and West Germany) will remain in Iraq until at least 2011. And we learned that while studying this question Obama had consulted, and earned the support of, Republican Senator John McCain.


Strikingly, there are expressions of President Obama’s pride that our troops “have succeeded beyond any expectations,” led by “two of our finest generals.” “You got the job done,” he told the Marines. Put another way: “Mission Accomplished.”


The Marines roared their approval of their (newly born) Commander in Chief. Aye, aye sir! Now President Obama, lead us to a similar victory in Afghanistan. We can do it!

Categories:
Taking notice
Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. The TNT is so quick to remember Obama’s campaign discussion of immediate withdrawl, Funny, I remember him saying repeatedly that we would leave Iraq as carefully as we were careless entering. That’s what I call leadership.

  2. derekyoung says:

    Obama never promised immediate withdrawal. His proposal has always been a 16 month process for withdrawal of combat troops. Now it appears that it will take 19 months, only three months more than candidate Obama had thought. The difference appears to be that he was persuaded to wait until after the elections in Iraq to begin that process.

  3. What happened to transparency, no lobbyists in his admin, no earmarks, adherence to high ethical standards, etc…

    No change that I can see.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0