Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Let the families decide on photos of the fallen

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Feb. 26, 2009 at 8:17 pm with 1 Comment »
February 26, 2009 8:17 pm

This editorial will appear in tomorrow’s print edition.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates was right to allow photography of coffins of war dead – on condition that loved ones agree.

Exploitation or honor? The U.S. policy of barring photographs of the coffins of war dead has been construed both ways.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates got it right Thursday, we believe, when he relaxed that policy to allow photographic coverage of the arrival of the flag-draped coffins – but only with the approval of the families involved.

The ban on public photography was imposed in 1991. Since the Iraq war began in 2003, it has been vehemently criticized and defended.

Critics – many of them opponents of the war – said the Bush administration was using the ban to prevent Americans from seeing frequent scenes of coffins coming home from Iraq through Dover Air Force Base in Delaware.

Defenders argued that the critics were bent on politically exploiting those scenes as antiwar propaganda.

But the question ought to be separated from the arguments over a fading war. The issue of how best to pay respect to the fallen deserves to be dealt with on its own merits.

There seems no intrinsic offense in photographing the dignified ceremony of unloading the coffins from transports and transferring them to waiting vehicles.

And coverage of these somber homecomings offers considerable instructive value. It’s a way to let America share in the ceremony and better appreciate the human costs of any war.

As Paul Rieckhoff, director the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said, "The sight of flag-draped coffins is, and should be, a sobering reminder to all Americans of the ultimate sacrifice our troops have made and the high price of our freedom."

This country has too little sense of the reality of those sacrifices.

That doesn’t mean any family should be forced to share its grief or its share of the ceremony. Simple respect calls for letting survivors decide whether the coffins of their own loved ones can be photographed.

As Gates said, "We ought not presume to make that decision in their place."

Presidents have made exceptions to the ban. In 2000, Bill Clinton allowed the Air Force to release photos of coffins of sailors killed in the terrorist attack on the USS Cole. The following year, under George W. Bush, the Air Force released a photo of the transfer of the remains of a victim of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

Both releases presumably served the purposes of those presidents. Far better to let the families – and the families alone – make that call.

What's coming
Leave a comment Comments → 1
  1. I agree with a great deal of what you said. The Nation needs to see that there is a human cost to War. Any War, not just those that are unpopular. The citizens of this Country have very little knowledge of the sacrifices being made by those in uniform. While the sight of a line of coffins may have some “shock and awe” educational value, such an image may also cause some to reflect for a moment and respect those that have made that sacrifice in service to their Nation.
    Had images such as these been shown to the World when the War in Iraq was at it’s peak, maybe it could have been stopped long before now and a lot of those coffins could have gone unused. That is, in part, the fault of a timid press.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0