Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

DuPont fire levy: A mess, but perhaps the cheaper route

Post by Kim Bradford on Oct. 9, 2008 at 10:21 am |
October 9, 2008 10:21 am

We ran a correction for our editorial on the City of DuPont’s levy for fire services earlier this week that deserves a fuller discussion here.

In writing the editorial, I considerably understated the amount that Lakewood Fire District residents pay for that district’s general operating expenses. It isn’t 87 cents per $1,000 of assessed value next year (the amount of the district’s excess levy). You have to add that amount to the $1.50 regular rate to come up with the real cost to Lakewood Fire residents: $2.37 per $1,000 of assessed value.

That’s significant to the discussion about DuPont’s controversial request for a property tax levy lid lift since annexation to Lakewood is one of the long-term options.

DuPont city officials originally asked for $1.80 for fire expenses, and that’s what’s on the ballot. But the city council, having discovered a legal flaw with its plan to segregate fire costs in the budget, says that it would assess only $1 of the $1.80. It’s worth noting that either number is well below the rate paid by residents of Lakewood Fire (which is essentially acting as DuPont’s de facto fire department under a contract).

You can argue, as we did, the wisdom of waiting until the fire department’s drain on the budget reached crisis levels and then trying to pass what amounts to a 100 to 180 percent tax increase. But the possibility remains that for DuPont residents, the levy lid lift might be the cheaper option.

Editorial outtakes
The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for Report violators to