Word gets around: Editorial writer Kim Bradford noted on the blog Wednesday that we’re preparing an editorial on the toxic-toy bill awaiting the governor’s signature.
Bingo, we got emails this morning from a representative of an association that represents makers of children’s carseats, and from Bill Stauffacher, a Pierce County political consultant representing the Toy Industry Association, and from a representative of Mattel, the big toymaker. Here’s Stauffacher’s pitch:
The legislature passed a bill with extremely low standards that apply to all parts of the toy – but offered no flexibility for accessible and non-accessible electronics (jacks, "lead free" solder, resistors), inaccessible parts (screws, axels, and joints) and phthalates widely used in plastic wiring and non-mouthable plastic parts of a toy. Many toys simply won’t meet the one-size-fits all standard established in Section 3 of the bill.
Additionally, small toy retailers are saying the bill’s costly testing and reporting requirements will lead toy makers (especially smaller niche toy makers) to avoid Washington State.
This issue is much more complicated than it appears. All parties – customers, toy makers, retailers – want safe toys and this goal can be achieved. But common sense arguments deserve a fair hearing.
A Wall Street Journal story Wednesday gave a good overview of the issue from a national perspective, noting that Washington is one of many states taking action due to inaction by federal regulators.
And this just in from the Washington Toxics Coalition:
Read more »