An effort to revise the Pierce County ethics code is stuck in “Park.”
Word from council chambers is that the council will once again postpone action on ethics code changes that were tabled in December for “further study.”
Councilmen Tim Farrell and Calvin Goings, both Democrats, were frustrated by a raft of new proposed amendments that appeared today with no previous review.
Councilman Roger Bush, R-Graham, who wants the code to take a much different approach that the version proposed by Farrell and Goings, urged taking more time to study the latest amendments.
It looks to me like the ethics code is caught up in election-year politics. (See our Sunday editorial). Both Goings, D-Puyallup, and Councilman Shawn Bunney, R-Lake Tapps, are running for county executive. I suspect Republicans don’t want Goings to be able to claim credit for a stronger ethics code. (see response from Councilman Roger Bush, R-Graham) below.)
Which leads me to another thought: Perhaps a wiser and less partisan approach would have been to appoint a reputable, broadbased and independent citizen panel to review the code and propose changes. Maybe it will take a citizen initiative to get the job done right.
County Councilman Roger Bush responds
I want to let you know that I believe that you have misunderstood what took place today regarding the proposed Ethics ordinance discussions.
First, in your third paragraph, you state that Farrell and Goings, “both Democrats, were frustrated by a raft of new proposed amendments that appeared today with no previous review.” This would lead readers to a false conclusion. Specifically, out of the four amendments, three were sponsored by Mr. Goings. Three other draft documents were included in the packet for discussion that have not as yet received sponsors (they were there for informational and discussion purposes…one from the Prosecutors, one from the Ethics Commissioners, and one from the Auditor.)
Read more »