Most of the letters to the editor we get are thoughtful expressions of the writers’ point of view. A small number, however, are mean-spirited, racist or even filthy.
One letter we received after columnist Charles Krauthammer’s column about Barack Obama appeared is the kind we don’t approve for publication. The writer implied that only black Americans would be interested in an Obama presidency. And if he or another black candidate were elected, it would likely result in the kind of wild celebrations that occur after a city’s team wins the World Series or a Super Bowl: "gangs take over the streets, people are killed or attacked, buildings are burned, etc."
Another recent letter writer described Sen. Maria Cantwell as a "prototypical liberal slut." His language went downhill from there. It was so filthy, I asked our computer folks to please filter out future screeds from him. He did sign his name, though. Most people who send really awful letters do so anonymously. Which gives us another reason to reject them: We don’t run anonymous letters.
What kind of letters DO we run? Here are some tips for better letter writing:
Read more »