Letters to the Editor

Your views in 250 words or less

Tag: WEA

March
12th

EDUCATION: It isn’t really about the kids, is it?

I’m wondering why the Washington Education Association is fighting additional evaluations for teachers and principals. I have listened to all of their talk about how it’s all for the children every time they decide to go out on strike in various school districts.

I’m also wondering why they would so strongly endorse losing the $40 million funding from the federal government. The reason they give is that districts can replace this funding from other sources. I surely hope that they remember these words when their contract talks come up again.

Is it really about new evaluations or is it really

Read more »

April
22nd

LOBBYISTS: State agencies lobby the Legislature?

Re: “Lobbying tab $12.9 million – and counting” (TNT, 4-22).

I was not surprised to learn of the amount spent on lobbying our Legislature. I was not surprised that the top lobbying organizations are the Service Employees International Union, the Washington Education Association and the Washington Federation of State Employees. What really surprised me was the fact that state agencies are now lobbying the Legislature.

If the state treasurer can’t understand “some profound issues connected to education finance,” then perhaps we need a new treasurer. If the superintendent of public instruction has to hire a lobbyist to “preserve staff and

Read more »

March
28th

EDUCATION: Another vote Callaghan should regret

Re: “Charter schools opponent to become a supporter?” (Peter Callaghan column, 3-28).

A word to Callaghan: Charter schools are a scam, another scheme by business to get its greedy mitts into the public treasury and destroy public education.

The only reason the charter school ballot measure barely got a majority was because the Washington Education Association and the state Democratic Party were lazy and failed to run a competent campaign. Nothing new there, of course.

Callaghan admits he voted for this terrible idea even though a large majority of his fellow Tacomans voted against it.

Well, he can just

Read more »

Oct.
4th

ELECTION: Tacoma mayor’s odd endorsement

I was delighted to read Tacoma Mayor Marilyn Strickland’s endorsement of the public charter school measure, Initiative 1240 (Viewpoint, 9-30). It’s encouraging to see that she has joined the ground-breaking bipartisan movement that seeks to put students first.

I understand that charter schools won’t be a silver bullet. They must be combined with other measures such as rewarding our best teachers, especially those who volunteer to work in the most challenging environments. We now have the opportunity to review successful charter schools from around the country and include in Washington charters only the aspects that will encourage student achievement,

Read more »

Sep.
27th

ELECTION: WEA’s actions show lack of integrity

It appears that the Washington Education Association, which purports to “put kids first,” will do whatever it takes to achieve their primary goal of electing a governor who is in its camp. This includes donations to OUR Washington in support of the negative “The Real Rob McKenna” TV ads (TNT, 9-27).

Since the Seattle Times recently found via fact check that the ads are mostly false, what does that say about the integrity of those who are charged with teaching our children?

March
22nd

EDUCATION: What is Callaghan’s problem?

Re: “School reformers lose PR battle but win the war” (Peter Callaghan column, 3-13).

Peter Callaghan doesn’t like me.He  has never met me. He doesn’t know my wife, family or friends. He’s never been to my house, my neighborhood or my church, yet he still doesn’t like me.

Callaghan thinks I’m lazy, overpaid and resistant to change. He thinks that my main concern in life is to protect my job and the jobs of my co-workers. He has never worked in my profession, has never visited my workplace and if he’s ever been in the economically depressed community in

Read more »

March
21st

HEALTH CARE: Equity or political pawn game?

I read, with interest the Viewpoint, “Bipartisan plan would give school employees health care equity” (TNT, 3-21).

Full disclosure: I’m an insurance agent/broker.

My question is, why is the Washington Education Association (WEA) opposed to this bill if it is so good for them? I’m guessing that it’s because it is not good for teachers and it does not put more money in the classroom.

A recent study by the actuaries at Milliman showed that this would not actually generate any real savings to the system and therefore would not create additional dollars for the classroom.

Creating a new

Read more »

March
12th

EDUCATION: Where’s reform from the WEA?

Re: “Here’s an idea for rich school reformers: Listen to teachers” (Your Voice, 3-11).

Patricia Drake is certainly correct in her summary statement that “We can do better.”

Siding with Washington Education Association (WEA) President Mary Lindquist against millionaire Nick Hanauer, Drake seeks to dismiss his reform agenda as inferior to her 44 years as an educator.

She bemoans the fact that she has no voice when compared to the millionaire, yet if education reform were going to come from the WEA, its more than 53,000 teachers and millions of dollars it has to spend from teacher’s union dues

Read more »