Re: “Something shady about the stadium” (Peter Callaghan column, 3-22).
The issue of the stadium roof (or lack of one) raises many questions.
• When does “avoiding transparency” become “knowing collusion”?
• When does “after the city’s own documents prove that it was a requirement, city officials continue to assert that it wasn’t” become lying to avoid admitting guilt?
• When does “and was done for the regular fan” become an out-and-out prevarication?
• When does “city representatives had an interest in keeping the Pacific Coast League financially viable and in town” become a poor excuse for not “speaking for …