March
7th
BIRTH CONTROL: It’s cheaper than pregnancy
Re: “Give choice to policy holders” (letter, 3-6).
I believe the writer is mistaken in his premise that policy holders would benefit by insurers not covering birth control. It is far cheaper to pay for birth control than to pay for pregnancy and all of the associated costs.
If we are to make decisions on a cost basis, then women who use birth control would be given cheaper insurance than those who do not.
If we are only interested in saving money, we should quit covering costs of erectile dysfunction (ED) drugs for men. For those who keep injecting …