Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

COURT: Patty Murray uses sexist language

Letter by David Cooke, Tacoma on July 11, 2014 at 11:41 am | No Comments »
July 11, 2014 12:37 pm

Sen. Patty Murray is pushing a bill to overturn Burwell v. Hobby Lobby by repealing part of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (which Murray voted for in 1993, by the way). Among the various slogans she is using, there is the plaintive cry that “five male justices” have deprived women of their rights.

Evidently, Murray – along with her numerous cohorts – feels that male jurists are not qualified to make legal decisions affecting women vis-à-vis birth control. And yet, one has to wonder: What about the seven male justices who decided Roe v. Wade? Or for that matter, the seven males who decided Eisenstadt v. Baird? Or the six males who decided Griswold v. Connecticut?

As a male who happens to believe in equal rights, I find Murray’s messaging to be repugnant, historically ignorant, contemptuous of the law and unbefitting a U.S. senator.

The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.