Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

FORESTS: Viewpoint writer made serious factual error

Letter by Corey Brinkema, Minneapolis, Minn. on July 12, 2013 at 12:01 pm with No Comments »
July 12, 2013 4:27 pm

A Viewpoint (TNT, 7-2) by David Overton included a serious factual error about the Forest Stewardship Council. His claim that the FSC provides money to ForestEthics, an environmental advocacy organization, is entirely false and reckless. We hope the error was based in the author’s ignorance and was not an intentional inaccuracy.

We’d also like to set the record straight about choices in forest certification. There are, in fact, considerable and substantive differences in the objectives and outcomes of existing programs.

Most environmental organizations, including many advocacy groups, exclusively endorse the FSC because they are able to play a direct role in our standard-setting and governance. In large part because of its inclusive and democratic processes, FSC standards demand high performance, going well beyond what’s required by law.

In exchange for recognition in the green marketplace, FSC-certified landowners agree to rigorous protection of threatened and endangered species, rare old growth and many other components of healthy forest ecosystems.

(Brinkema is president of the Forest Stewardship Council US.)

Leave a comment Comments
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0