Re: “Yes vote on marriage equality is right for Washington” (editorial, 9-17).
Would not a yes vote on Referendum 74 actually be a vote in favor of marriage inequality, and in reality be a strange vote in favor of gender equality?
Marriage and family were the first and most important institutions created by God on Earth. His plan is explicit that marriage consists of one male and one female. This instruction clearly rules out homosexual “marriage.”
So, would not a yes vote on R-74 certainly enshrine into law that God made an immense mistake on marriage because male and female have always been interchangeable and equal in purpose? That there is no significant differences between the genders in the role, function and responsibility of husband and wife, father and mother. That neither male or female, husband or wife, father or mother offer any meaningful or critical benefit to the raising of children. That man is woman, and woman is man.
A no vote on R-74 will be a vote against Washington’s obsession with strange gender equality and of it’s persistent rejection of God’s instruction for marriage. A yes vote on R-74 will in fact say yes to marriage inequality and yes to human rebellion, selfishness and self-indulgence with children paying the severe consequences.