Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

MARRIAGE: Let’s secure equality for all

Letter by Sue Redkey, Gig Harbor on July 20, 2012 at 9:32 am with 4 Comments »
July 20, 2012 10:22 am

Re: “Join states affirming tradition” (letter, 7-17).

I disagree with the writer’s conclusion that our Creator intended for heterosexual committed relationships (marriages) to be the only ones deserving of legal recognition and protection simply because “only a man and a woman have the ability to populate the earth.”

First, the obvious: Procreation does not require marriage, and marriage does not require intended or actual pro-creation.

Second, also obvious: Traditional marriage does not necessarily make a more perfect union – just ask all the heterosexual couples who divorce, even if for reasons other than adultery, spousal or child abuse or abandonment

Third: Equal rights for all means that the civil rights granted by our government – like the right to legal recognition and protection of committed relationships and families – may not be denied to certain minority groups based on a popular vote or the bias of one or more religious groups. Thus, the marriage discrimination laws passed in those 32 states the letter writer so admires will surely be reversed one day as being unconstitutional.

I am proud that our state has passed a law ending marriage discrimination, and I feel it’s beyond offensive that opponents of marriage equality think we should vote on who’s equal and who’s not. A yes vote on Referendum 74 will secure equality for all, without denying any religious groups the right to maintain their own traditions.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. Excellent letter, true, factual, civil, and bound to set the red side into fits of apoplexy and oral regurgitation.

  2. If you support maximizing the incidences of stable, loving family environments with all the benefit and responsibilities that go with them, then you should support gay marriage.

  3. vingrotto says:

    Nice letter, Sue. Logical and well written. Unlike the two comments above mine. Huh?

  4. josephcristel says:

    The law did not end all marriage “discrimination”, just homosexual unions. If your a polygamist forget the celebration.Denied to this minority.
    Everybody claims a “right” nowdays. If they want something,it’s a “right”. Yours,of course, is a civil “right”. Like being black.No,that can’t be true.Being black is genetical and homosexuality,though having diverse causes, isn’t. Disagree? Just point to the replicatable main stream studies or the “gene” that proves it.I thought so.Nice try anyhow.
    That mantra of…”I’ve got a right”..might still work.Keep at it.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0