Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

BUDGET: Gimmick doesn’t result in more revenue

Letter by Ralph R. Kraft, Gig Harbor on March 22, 2012 at 2:02 pm with 3 Comments »
March 22, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: “Could this be the idea that will fix the budget?” (TNT, 3-22).

So, state politicians think and hope they found an additional $238 million to spend. As an accountant, I agree it could help cash flow, but the article stated that local governments would get their money at the same time as they have been, so there is no cash flow benefit.

The article also states that this scheme will strengthen the state’s balance sheet. It will increase the state’s cash account. but at the same time the offset would be a liability on the balance sheet to pay the localities their share of the sales tax, even if the money is put in a separate account. In effect, it is a zero gain.

The politicians need to realize there is no additional revenue in this scheme. It always amazes me how easy it is for the political class to spend taxpayers’ money.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. BigSwingingRichard says:

    Good letter, but you need to understand that common sense has no role in State budget formations.

  2. blakeshouse says:

    These socialist idiots in Olympia couldn’t balance 2 nickles with a dime if their life depends on it. The sheeple of this state don’t deserve any better than this considering they KEEP reelecting these idiots…

  3. LornaDoone says:

    “The politicians need to realize there is no additional revenue in this scheme.”

    There it is, folks. Right from an accountant.

    No additional revenue.

    Maybe Mr. Kraft can tell us, specifically, which state program to eliminate and where we can add revenue to balance the budget.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0