Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

I-1163: Measure only helps union, not families

Letter by Christina McElroy, Puyallup on Oct. 31, 2011 at 2:43 pm with 6 Comments »
October 31, 2011 2:43 pm

Re: “Parents should be exempt” (letter, 10-28).

I thank the writer for stating the problem with SEIU and Initiative 1163. I also have a young adult child who experiences autism, and I also had to spend a perfectly fine Saturday attending “training,” at which I learned very little.

Additionally, we have family and close friends who are willing to provide care and for which they, quite reasonably, wish to be compensated, but the current training requirements discourage their enrollment. The difficulty will be compounded if I-1163 passes.

I-1163 does not address the shortage of compassionate care providers. These care providers are already subject to background checks and continuing education requirements. Very few continuing education classes offer information relevant to the needs of physically healthy young adults, but rather focus on the elderly and very frail clients.

Furthermore, there are no exemptions, even for grandparents, siblings or for the part-time care providers whose regular job includes continuing education requirements and accountability, such as nurses, teachers, paraeducators or nursing assistants.

The training must be taken through Training Partnerships, an arm of SEIU; we are not allowed to “count” hours spent in a seminar that might be actually useful but outside of Training Partnerships. Examples would be attending an update on community access for those with autism or estate planning for special needs.

Families dealing with special needs deserve support and understanding. I-1163 offers neither, but rather adds to our already full-to-overflowing plates. This measure will enrich SEIU at the expense of individuals.

Leave a comment Comments → 6
  1. Christina,
    The solution to your problem is simply to not accept public funding or public-funded help.

  2. itwasntmethistime says:

    Your family and close friends charge you for helping you out? You need better friends. Can’t do anything about the family, I suppose.

  3. alindasue says:

    xring and itwasntmethistime,

    As it was explained to me when I first was hired to care for my son:
    It is cheaper for the state to pay a family caretaker to stay home to care for a severely disabled family member than it is to provide outside the home services for the disabled person while the caretaker has to go outside the home to work.

    My reservations about I-1163 are very much like Ms. McElroy’s.

  4. Voltaire says:

    since when can one have too much training?

  5. alindasue says:

    This issue is not so much “too much training” but the type of training required by I-1183 does not necessarily fit in with the specific needs of the disabled person the caregiver is working with.

  6. alindasue says:

    Oops, I meant I-1163.

    Too many initiatives with similar numbers…

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0