Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

TAXES: Will legislators learn from their mistakes?

Letter by George Frey, Puyallup on Oct. 3, 2011 at 10:57 am with 2 Comments »
October 3, 2011 2:41 pm

There is now discussion about new taxes to help offset some of the budget shortfall that is projected for the state’s 2012-2013 budget.

Not too many years ago we had plenty of revenue from existing sources. The legislators and citizens saw this as an opportunity to create and fund new programs. Government spending grew much faster than inflation. We certainly didn’t want a multibillion-dollar savings account, so we spent it.

Now the economy is in the tank, and all of that money is gone. If we approve new taxes, is the Legislature going to put a firm end date on them or is this just going to be more money for them to fund programs with once the economy improves? History tells us that we seldom see taxes go down.

As soon as the economy improves there will be calls to reinstate all of the funding that has been cut. Some of these programs and jobs should be funded again, but some of the cuts should remain. Expenditures should be strictly limited to grow no faster than inflation.

We need to do a better job of managing state funds and limiting the growth of government jobs. Private sector jobs create revenue for the state government. Government jobs have to be paid for by the taxes we pay.

This is a painful time for many families and businesses. It will get better, but it will take time. I hope we learn from what we are experiencing and don’t repeat our mistakes.

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. KARDNOS says:

    We need to do a better job of managing state funds and limiting the growth of government jobs. Private sector jobs create revenue for the state government. Government jobs have to be paid for by the taxes we pay.

    George…first of all…government jobs provide services required to make the government function.

    Second – government jobs create revenue for the state.

    As to government jobs having to be paid for by taxes….would you rather pay cash when the only road to your house is out because of a flood?

  2. He didn’t say that we should eliminate government. Certainly there is a place for government. Are there government jobs that don’t generate revenue for the state that could be provided for by the private sector? When we analyze the costs do we take into account all of the benefits and retirement costs for government workers versus outsourcing to the private sector?

    As big a part is all of the programs that are funded by the state. It is boring but look at the 400+page budget. The synopsis will show you where state government spends money. Should we be subsidizing all of these programs and activities? There are many cuts that can be made.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0