Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

PDC: Sunshine Committee equally important

Letter by Curtis M. Anderson, Tacoma on Aug. 31, 2011 at 11:33 am with 1 Comment »
August 31, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: “Citizens should update, fund Public Disclosure Commission” (column, 8-28)

Peter Callaghan makes a valid point that Public Disclosure Commission should be funded and be active.

Another side of the picture concerns the Public Records Accountability (Sunshine) Committee.

It is certainly in the public’s interest for the PDC to publish the record of candidates’ funding sources to show which special interest groups heavily support a particular person and in turn expect support from that person for legislation favorable to the supporting group.

It is equally as important that public records and meetings be open for scrutiny of the taxpayer. Since the law requiring openness in meetings and records was passed in 1972, the number of exemptions has grown from 10 to more than 300. In today’s climate of extreme partisanship and very heavy pressure on the Governor, Legislature and other entities,the large number of exemptions many times cover deals and executive orders that may not be at all good public policy.

Fund the Sunshine Committee and require it to be active and accountable.

Leave a comment Comments → 1
  1. Curtis,
    I’m with you. The fact that there are so many exemptions shows how much our elected officals hate and fear the PDC and why it is so under funded.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0