Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

AIR SECURITY: Better read than dead

Letter by Kenneth E. Christopherson, Tacoma on Nov. 23, 2010 at 1:12 pm | 25 Comments »
November 23, 2010 1:12 pm

Re: “Opt-Out Day at airports? Now that’s a junky idea” (editorial, 11-22).

The editorial was right: Public fuss about airport X-ray and pat-downs is unrealistic. Gynecologists and proctologists do more privacy invasive actions every day — without getting sexy! Airport security personnel would do their actions hundreds of times a day and think “Ho, Hum!”

Yes, there are rare exceptions: Some rare doctors repeat sexual misdeeds, under privacy. But one airport security examiner sees you, fleetingly, just once — and then never again! No danger!

I have for decades had much personal contact with many Europeans, there and here. They’ve often told me that Americans have much more hang-ups about sex. Many European airports already have these more intimate security checks — without any public uproars.

This American vastly prefers as tight security as possible rather than face higher possibility of dying from a plane crash caused by a suicide bomber.

The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.