The complete story isn’t out yet, but the recent number of police shootings has me wondering if their new policy is shoot first (to kill) and ask questions later? And why is it that the first official statements typically defend the officer’s actions? Are they infallible? Surely not, but it is time to ask some questions of police officers:
• Why was your gun the first choice of defense even when no one had been hurt?
• What attempts were made to get officer backup before deciding to use your gun?
• What is it about holding a knife overhead that warrants a police officer ordering someone to drop it, and then shooting to kill when he doesn’t?
I understand and still believe that police are trained to only shoot as a last resort and when acting to protect their own life or the life of another. However, the recent spate of deaths gives the appearance that more and better training is needed.
I don’t want to read about one more police officer killed on (or off) duty. Never. But tragic deaths like these in our community, at the hands of the police, may give criminals the reason they need to shoot first, too, if only because that’s what they think our police do now. Don’t give criminals that reason, please.