Letters to the Editor

Your views in 200 words or less

ZOO: Limits on family membership need review

Letter by Mark Messinger, Olympia on Aug. 18, 2010 at 1:21 pm with 4 Comments »
August 18, 2010 1:21 pm

For years, my family has enjoyed a membership at the Point Defiance Zoo and Northwest Trek. We’ve renewed the deluxe household membership, year after year. But no more. A policy which prohibits kids from entering without their parents – and requiring that families pay $25 to add each kid’s name to the membership – has made the deluxe household membership far too costly.

One of my two kids is a licensed driver under age 19. If she were to drive her sister, neither of them could be admitted without my paying an additional $50 to the cost of a $165 deluxe household membership.

But she has a photo ID with a last name and mailing address that matches that on the membership. That, we are told, is not good enough. But, the deluxe household membership offers generous privileges for families to bring guests. Again, the kids’ names have to be on the membership, for them to be admitted without the parent. The fee for adding those names is arbitrarily set at $25 a head.

There’s nothing “deluxe” or even “household” about this.

Particularly in these economically challenging times, I hope the Point Defiance Zoo and Northwest Trek will reassess this poor policy.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. colsprague says:

    The solution is to name the teenager as one of the named adults on the membership. You get two named adults for a family membership. (Or one and a “guest” card that has to be used by someone with the first adult present.) Then whichever parent is mroe likely to go to the zoo without the other should have the other named card. The unnamed parent can go as a guest.

    If you want three named adults, pay the extra $25. Seems simple enough.

  2. Flanagan says:

    The answer is …..return the animals to the wild which is much more humane that keeping them penned up for life.

  3. nonstopjoe says:

    Set the animals free and cage the politicians.

  4. LuckyCharm says:

    Ditto Flanagan and nsj — wild animals shouldn’t be used for entertainment purposes.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0