Lights & Sirens

Go behind the yellow tape with The News Tribune

NOTICE: Lights & Sirens has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Lights & Sirens.
Visit the new section.

Pierce County sheriff’s detective who criticized prosecutor serves 3-day suspension

Post by Adam Lynn / The News Tribune on Sep. 29, 2011 at 11:43 am with 3 Comments »
September 29, 2011 11:43 am

A Pierce County sheriff’s detective who used her county-issued smart phone to send an email critical of Prosecutor Mark Lindquist to The News Tribune recently served a three-day suspension without pay.

An internal investigation found Glenda Nissen violated policies regarding use of county equipment and rules prohibiting law enforcement officers from openly criticizing the criminal justice system, said deputy prosecutor Craig Adams, who serves as Sheriff Paul Pastor’s legal advisor.

Nissen also was found to have violated the department’s Code of Ethics, Adams said this week.

Nissen sent an email to News Tribune publisher David Zeeck shortly after midnight on June 7, 2010, from her county email address.

In the email, Nissen accused Lindquist of corruption. Nissen sent a second email to Zeeck at 3:50 a.m., asking him to disregard her earlier statements. The email was not published.

Those emails prompted her colleagues to investigate her as a possible suspect in a threatening letter sent to Lindquist’s chief criminal deputy prosecutor.

The letter was postmarked June 7, 2010, and sent from Seattle to the deputy prosecutor’s home address.

Kitsap County prosecutors, who were asked to review the case, declined to file charges against Nissen. She’s back at work.

Nissen filed a claim for damages against the county, claiming Lindquist retaliated against her for her criticisms by prohibiting her from entering the prosecutor’s offices. Lindquist said he was trying to protect his threatened employee.

Nissen and the county settled the claim out of court, and she has been allowed to return to the prosecutor’s offices under rules applicable to all visitors to the office.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. BlaineCGarver says:

    So much for the First Amendment….

  2. devilsadvocate says:

    If you think this is a First Amendment issue then 1) you obviously didn’t read the article and 2) You don’t know anything about the First Amendment , or the Constitution.

    The First Amendment does not give a person the right to violate work policies or the departments Code of Ethics, both of which she agreed to when she was hired.

  3. I call it protection of the unqualified. If you want to see corruption at work, go read the case file on the Petition for Recall of Lindquist.

    I say this cop is lucky she knew where a few skeletons were located. That’s why they settled her claim.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0