Blue Byline

A cop's perspective of the news and South Sound matters

Military should stick to war, leave crime to cops

Post by Brian O'Neill on June 6, 2013 at 8:05 am with 3 Comments »
June 6, 2013 8:05 am

Humble and contrite are two words one would not normally connect with the four star generals and admirals who lead our nation’s military. However, it was an apt description for the military’s power brokers last Tuesday during a congressional hearing on the prevalence of sexual assaults in the U.S. armed forces.

The Joint Chiefs before Congress/ courtesy slate.com
The Joint Chiefs before Congress/ courtesy slate.com

It was a rare dressing down for the Joint Chiefs, but it was deserved. The Pentagon’s unswerving devotion to the old adage, “It’s the way we’ve always done it” is at least partly to blame for the epidemic of rapes and other sexual assaults in the world’s most powerful military.

Congressional leaders who demanded explanations for the state of affairs received both apologies from the Pentagon elite and a resolute stance for maintaining the status quo: keeping allegations of rape within the chain of command.

Citing the need to maintain “discipline and good order,” the service chiefs responses were not good enough for several angry representatives who sense a prevailing attitude of nonchalance toward sexual assaults within the ranks.

The Pentagon’s own statistics back up this concern. A recent survey concluded that an estimated 26,000 service members were sexually assaulted last year alone. The vast majority went unreported by victims who feared either their attacker, the repercussions from their chain of command or both.

If the numbers are true, this debacle dwarfs other sexual abuse scandals, including the one that continues to embroil the Catholic Church. The huge numbers are perhaps more understandable when the conflict of interest built into the chain of command reporting system is exposed.

Clearly this is an indefensible policy. In fact, this is one instance where the Department of Defense could take a cue from its paramilitary counterpart, local law enforcement.

Within most police agencies, performance issues both big and small are handled in-house, much the same as in the armed forces. However, when a police officer is suspected of a crime, the subsequent investigation is almost immediately passed off to an outside agency. So-called outside agency investigations are now routine within the law enforcement community and are instrumental in preventing unfair prosecutions and protecting victims.

This is an important distinction from the military, which obviously prefers to keep its dirty laundry in its own basket. Whether one believes the admirals and generals oft repeated claims of unit integrity, good order and discipline, it still amounts to the same thing: “That’s the way we’ve always done it.”

Correct. And see how that’s worked out?

Instead, the military leaders should fall in line with police chiefs and sheriffs who understand the finer points of law – including impartiality and fairness – and who can also claim first hand experience interviewing the brokenhearted victims of rape.

The four star generals and admirals who serve the nation so admirably should accept that they are much better at fighting wars than protecting their troops from the scourge of sexual assault. If they can’t see that bitter fact written in their own shameful statistics, then the lawmakers must show them that a gavel outranks four stars every day of the week.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. Remember when women were just getting into the side of the military
    out in the field? That was an argument then, ‘They’re going to get raped
    by our guys or the enemy.’ Swift, sure punishment may only partially
    cut this problem down.

  2. scott0962 says:

    Why is the Commander in Chief for the most part getting a free pass on this issue? If anyone has the power and authority to initiate a zero tolerance policy for sexual assault in the military its President Obama. All he has to do is call the Joint Chiefs into his office, tell them its going to stop and to go make it happen or be relieved, along with any other commander who doesn’t get with the program. Make a few examples if necessary to show he’s serious about the policy and the rest will fall in line, that’s how the military operates. We certainly have enough flag officers to spare if examples need to be made.

    The military is not a democracy: you don’t ask them to change their social climate, you tell them and you hold commanders accountable for making the change happen. President Obama needs to show some leadership on this issue: he’s the CIC, he should act like it.

  3. Brian O'Neill says:

    That’s actually a fair question, scott0962. I have not heard much out of the President’s mouth on this issue, and he most definitely has the authority to enact change.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0